🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam order, the nation's top court permitted Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that is projected to include several five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a district court's ruling that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Explanation

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and upsetting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its decision.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the boundaries. It had instructed the state to use the districts created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Opposition

Through a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She argued that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was actually authored by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan wrote in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a infraction of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling comes amid a national battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican majority. Typically, redistricting takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to proceed with a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that might create several more conservative seats. The opposition, for their part, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas top lawyer welcomed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes supportive of Republicans. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

Conversely, opposition party leaders decried the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another leading Democratic leader said the court had another time damaged its standing by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.