🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since those days, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is commemorated is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, far-right parties are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to scrub Black history and narrative from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a professor at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are remnants of an time that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade governmental matters, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and adaptive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is in order – Black History is Now Month.